A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out concerning potential neighbours around the development of the wall in a coastal website in a very north Dublin suburb, a case that has attracted nationwide notice subsequent an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed loved ones property at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of preparing breaches, environmental worries, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Times post about René Collier along with the Irish Periods posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has progressed right into a really publicised lawful fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of development will work at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a business director respectively, seek out to construct their family members house. The situation happens to be emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where by enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections as well as sensitivities of recognized citizens. According to the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying created by their prospective neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted underneath organizing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally citizens of Dublin Highway, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their scheduling permission by developing a wall past the boundaries in their web site, bringing about an encroachment on a Distinctive Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, as a result areas are subject matter to stringent controls underneath European and Irish environmental law. Of their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments might have lasting ecological repercussions, significantly within a delicate coastal environment including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach in their preparing permission, and say the wall, and that is partly built, is in the correct placement. Their lawful group has characterised the motion being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful development. The couple accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding so that you can maintain their perspective, an allegation that has been repeated in court and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal setting up disputes, where by sights of The ocean are equally remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular attempts through the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the site, Based on sworn proof referenced from the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded via midsection-significant drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the website Irish Occasions, a picture which has because become emblematic of your intensity of the dispute. These steps were not basically symbolic; they have been meant to Get visual evidence of the wall’s situation relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website from the sea Irish Periods documented, describing how The 2 Gentlemen entered the water through extreme climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm h2o to photograph the site grew to become Just about the most putting descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Situations write-up about accountant Paul Feely observed that this kind of actions ended up cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into a location afflicted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was currently being encroached on.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been lined intimately via the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 turned greatly searched phrases as audience sought to know the background and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court read further submissions on no matter whether interim orders really should be granted to halt building pending an entire hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key instant from the lawful timeline.
On the core in the dispute is often a disagreement more than boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain that the wall, as constructed, goes further than what was authorised and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has become described as meticulous in his examination of planning paperwork, maps, and disorders connected towards the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both pressured that their motion is determined by worry for environmental safety and adherence to planning legislation. They reject claims that the case is about preserving A personal look at, insisting as an alternative that it's about making certain that development at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they've got explained their extended-standing relationship to the area and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a couple only attempting to produce a family members household in accordance Using the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches with a Distinctive Space of Conservation and say that all operates are actually carried out depending on Specialist information and authorized programs. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with moving into The ocean throughout a storm, will not change the underlying points.
The case has also elevated broader questions on how planning disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute around construction of wall at coastal internet site happens to be a shorthand description to get a condition that numerous observers see as more and more prevalent. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation in between personal land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is now extra contentious.
The Irish Situations short article about René Collier observed that the businessman experienced Earlier been associated with local advocacy on planning and environmental difficulties, however not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Periods report about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from pretty unique Skilled backgrounds can discover by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, have grown to be synonymous with the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site through the sea Irish Occasions coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of midsection-higher drinking water during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations and René Collier waded via waistline-superior water in the course of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Occasions are phrases that appeared continuously in protection, reflecting both of those the physical reality in the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature of your act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the site see as an excessive method.
Since the High Court proceedings keep on, the end result stays uncertain. The court should decide if the wall as constructed complies with organizing permission and no matter whether any encroachment into a Unique Region of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and setting up problems. Nevertheless the human component remains central: neighbours who will have to Stay along with each other very long following the legal prices are paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than design performs at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, even so the implications of the case prolong beyond that tackle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the necessity of clarity in organizing permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. What's more, it underscores how swiftly an area disagreement can escalate when fundamental difficulties like environmental defense and property rights are perceived being at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays an area of natural splendor and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre on the dispute stands partly constructed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful concerns. No matter if it'll in the long run be altered, eradicated, or finished as planned will rely upon the court docket’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will most likely keep on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to Among the most intently viewed setting up disputes in north Dublin recently.